Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 00235
Original file (PD2013 00235.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX               CASE: PD1300235
BRANCH OF SERVICE: Army
           BOARD DATE: 20131213
Date of Permanent SEPARATION: 20050506  


SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty SPC/E-4 (54D10/Chemical Operations Specialist) medically separated for posttraumatic arthritis of the right knee and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). She sustained a right femur and tibia/fibula fracture in a motor vehicle accident (MVA) while deployed to Iraq in 2003. Her mental health symptoms also began in relation to the MVA when she developed nightmares, depression and lack of interest. The conditions could not be adequately rehabilitated to meet the physical requirements of her Military Occupational Specialty (MOS) or satisfy physical fitness standards. She was issued a permanent L3/S3 profile and referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). The right knee arthritis and PTSD conditions, characterized as traumatic arthritis right knee, “post-traumatic anterior right knee pain and PTSD, chronic were forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501. The Informal PEB (IPEB) adjudicated posttraumatic arthritis of the right knee” and “PTSD as unfitting, rated 10% and 10%. The CI appealed to the Formal PEB (FPEB), which affirmed the IPEB findings and ratings. Subsequent to both IPEB and FPEB, the MEB documented “left knee internal derangement” as not meeting retention standards, in addition to the aforementioned conditions. There was no record of a PEB finding with respect to the left knee. The CI made no further appeals and was medically separated.


CI CONTENTION: The CI elaborated no specific contention in his application.


SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board’s scope of review is defined in DoDI 6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e.(2). It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and those conditions identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB when specifically requested by the CI. In addition, the CI was notified by the Army that her case may be eligible for review of the disability evaluation of her mental health condition in accordance with Secretary of Defense directive for a comprehensive review of members who were referred to a disability evaluation process between 11 September 2001 and 30 April 2012 and whose mental health diagnoses were changed during that process.

The rating for the unfitting PTSD and right knee conditions are addressed below along with a review of any other mental health conditions. Conditions or a contention not requested in this application, remain eligible for future consideration by the Board for Correction of Military Records.




RATING COMPARISON :

Service FPEB – Dated 20050127
VA - (2 Wks Pre -Separation)
Condition
Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam
Post-traumatic Arthritis Rt Knee 5010 10% Residuals of Fracture, Rt femur 5255 10% 20050419
Degenerative Changes, Chondromalacia Patellae, Post-Op Rt Knee 5010-5260 10% 20050419
Residuals of Fracture, Rt Tibia/Fibula 5262 0% 20050419
PTSD 9411 10% PTSD 9411 50%* 20050419
No Additional MEB/PEB Entries
Other x 4 20050419
Combined: 20%
Combined: 70%
Derived from VA Rating Decision (VA RD ) dated 200 50518 ( most proximate to date of separation [ DOS ] ).
* PTSD rating was reduced to 30% effective 20080201.


ANALYSIS SUMMARY: The PEB adjudicated the CI’s PTSD as unfitting and provided a permanent disability rating of 10%. The PEB rating, derived from DoDI 1332.39, preceded the promulgation of the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) 2008 mandate for DoD adherence to the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) §4.129. The Board, IAW DoDI 6040.44 and DoD guidance (which applies current VASRD §4.129 to all Board cases as appropriate), agrees that the stipulations of §4.129 are met in this case; and, will thus recommend a minimum 50% PTSD rating for a retroactive 6-month period of reconstructive Temporary Disability Retired List (TDRL). The Board must then determine the most appropriate fit with VASRD §4.130 criteria at 6 months for its permanent rating recommendation. As with the PTSD condition, the Board will assess a permanent rating recommendation for the unfitting right knee condition based on the relevant evidence at 6 months.

PTSD Condition. The psychiatric narrative summary (NARSUM) notes the CI had a history of chronic PTSD following a severe MVA in which she suffered multiple fractures of her right leg. At the MEB psychiatric exam, approximately 8 months before TDRL entry, the CI reported sleep difficulties, nightmares, intrusive thoughts, social withdrawal and estrangement, depressed mood, difficulty recalling the event and concentrating. There was no MEB mental status exam (MSE) noted, but the examiner noted review of six outpatient treatment records. In a 15 September 2004 mental health (MH) note, most proximate to the date of separation, the examiner noted “the patient’s mental status exam is very reassuring.” A service treatment record (STR) MSE entry noted a mildly constricted affect and depressed mood but an otherwise normal exam. Six telephonic MH consults that followed indicated that the CI was responding well to a sleep medication. Additional medication which treated her pain and improved her mood was added to control irritability and mood swings. The last note in the service treatment record (STR) indicated that the CI was doing well on these medications. The AXIS I diagnosis was PTSD causing marked impairment and depressive disorder, related to her physical injuries, causing mild impairment. The examiner noted the CI had a minor depressive syndrome and that she remained symptomatic despite treatment. Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF) was 60 (moderate symptoms or moderate difficulty in social, occupational, or school functioning.) At the VA Compensation and Pension (C&P) exam completed on 19 April 2005, approximately 2 weeks before separation, the CI reported nightmares, sleep disturbances, anxiety, startle responses and flashbacks of the accident. She reported fear of driving. There was no MSE documented. Review of STR was noted with a diagnosis of PTSD. At the post-separation VA C&P PTSD examination, approximately 27 months after separation, the CI reported troubling nightmares several times per week described as “weird” involving many topics such as being chased, kidnapped, mother dying, or her children getting hurt. She reported ruminating about military experiences, sleep difficulties, anxiety due to being pregnant and paranoia. She was off her medications due to her pregnancy. The CI reported being unemployed since military discharge because she was recuperating from her injuries. She had taken classes and graduated in July 2006 as a certified medical assistant with plans to enter the medical field. She was in a good marriage and was pregnant as noted. The CI reported chronic sleep disturbances, but enjoyed leisure activities and denied any substance abuse. There was no history of violence, suicidal or homicidal ideas or panic attacks. At the MSE the CI was noted to be cooperative and made good eye contact. She was fully oriented with normal thought, speech, memory and concentration. There was no evidence of delusions, or hallucinations. Her mood was mildy depressed with a congruent affect. The diagnosis was AXIS I - chronic PTSD and GAF was 60.

The Board directs attention to its rating recommendatio
n based on the above evidence. The PEB rated the PTSD at 10%, and the VA at 50%, with follow-up exam scheduled at 6 months. The Board considered the rating at the time of placement on TDRL IAW §4.129 as discussed above and unanimously agreed that there was not a preponderance of evidence in the record to support a rating higher than 50%. After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt) and §4.7 (higher of two ratings), the Board recommends a TDRL entry disability rating of 50% for the PTSD condition IAW §4.130. The Board next considered the permanent disability rating of the PTSD condition. The additional medical evidence in the record is limited to a remote VA C&P completed on 08 August 2007, approximately 27 months after separation. There was no relevant VA outpatient or civilian provider evidence during the 6-month interval. This deprives the Board of evidence for judging the stress of transition to civilian life, which is a key intent of §4.129, and generally a significant element underlying the Board’s permanent rating recommendation. In cases such as this, the Board, of necessity, must base the permanent rating recommendation on the information at separation and, to a certain extent, on the anticipated (more likely than not) prognosis at 6 months. The evidence in the STR cited by the MEB psychiatric addendum indicated the CI was doing well on medications at separation. The VA C&P examination weeks before separation relied on the same objective information from the STR. The Board opined that at separation the CI met the 10% rating IAW §4.130 specified as mild or transient symptoms which decrease work efficiency and ability to perform occupational tasks only during periods of significant stress or, symptoms controlled by continuous medication. A 50% minimum rating for placement on reconstructive TDRL was mandated by VASRD §4.129 and DoD guidance, as noted above. At the remote VA C&P examination the CI was happily married, off medications due to pregnancy and planning a future career in the health field. She continued to have sleep disturbances and frequent dreams, with mildly depressed mood and an otherwise normal MSE. Members agreed that based on the evidence in the records available, the CI’s anticipated disability due to the PTSD condition deemed stable at 6 months post-separation more likely than not met the 10% rating. The Board reviewed to see if the PTSD condition met the higher rating of 30% and concluded it did not as there was no evidence in the records of intermittent inability to perform occupational tasks. After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board recommends a permanent disability rating of 10% for the PTSD condition IAW §4.130

Right Knee Arthritis Condition. The NARSUM notes that the CI had a history of multiple fractures involving the femur (upper leg), tibia and fibula (lower leg) of her right leg in an MVA while deployed. She had open reduction and internal fixation procedures of the right femur and tibia, but had persistent pain of the right lower leg requiring the use of a cane for ambulation despite treatment. The CI had a diagnostic arthroscopy in 2003 that showed swelling over one of the femur screws in the upper leg (which was removed) and degenerative changes of the knee and patella with intact ligaments and cartilage. Right leg X-rays in August 2004 showed healed fractures of the femur, tibia and fibula with post-surgical changes and mild degenerative changes. CT scan of the right leg in August 2004 was read as “a non-healing fracture of the tibia but this was noted to be normal, without evidence of bony nonunion, per the orthopedic specialist. At the MEB exam on 21 September 2004, approximately eight months before TDRL entry, the CI reported right knee and anterior leg pain that increased with activity. The MEB physical exam noted well healed surgical scars of the right leg. Right knee flexion-extension range-of-motion (ROM) was 0°-110° (normal 0°-140°), without evidence of laxity or instability, with decreased muscle strength of four out of five and painful motion. At an orthopedic addendum completed on 09 November 2004, approximately 6 months before TDRL entry, the right knee was without effusion and was non-tender to palpation. The remainder of the exam was unchanged from the MEB exam. X-rays of the right knee in January 2005 were unchanged. At the VA C&P exam on 19 April 2005, approximately 2 weeks before separation, the CI reported pain in the right knee. She reported that the right knee gives way and that she had fallen many times. The CI reported right leg pain of the femur and tibia that were “doing quite well” with pain “…maybe three times per week... The VA exam showed an antalgic gait on the right due to knee pain. Right knee ROM was normal without instability or tenderness to palpation. There was tender to palpation of the right tibia. There were no post-separation records available regarding the CI’s knee condition. The later VA Rating Decisions (VARD) in August 2007, November 2007 and April 2008 addressed only the PTSD condition.

The Board directs attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence. The PEB coded the right knee condition as 5010 (traumatic arthritis) rated at 10%. The VA coded the right knee condition as 5255 (residuals of femur fracture/femur impairment) rated at 10%; residuals of right tibia/fibula fracture as 5262 (tibia/fibula impairment) rated at 0%; and degenerative joint disease, chondromalacia patella as 5003-5260 (analogous limited leg flexion and arthritis) rated at 10%. The Board first considered the rating of the right knee condition at the time of placement on the TDRL. The Board opined that the CI had residual pain in her right knee due to traumatic degenerative changes related to her combined healed upper and lower leg fractures without evidence of instability, cartilage damage, or non-healing. There was no compensable loss of ROM of the right knee noted at either the MEB or VA exams. The CI had residual pain with degenerative changes of the knee demonstrated on imaging studies and arthroscopic surgery. The Board agreed that the right knee could only be rated for pain IAW §4.59 (painful motion) at 10% at TDRL entry and there was no path to a higher evaluation. After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt) and §4.59, the Board recommends a TDRL entry disability rating of 10% for the right knee post-traumatic arthritis condition coded 5010. The Board next considered the permanent disability rating of the right knee condition. As noted there are no post-separation records available regarding the right knee condition. The later VARDs addressed only the PTSD condition and the right leg ratings remained the same. Notes in the STR indicated that the orthopedic specialist counseled the CI that post-traumatic degenerative joint disease would continue to be an issue in the right knee. The Board agreed that based on the available evidence in the record the CI met the 10% rating for the right knee condition due to painful motion with post-traumatic arthritis at the time of re-evaluation of the of TDRL disability rating. After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 and §4.59, the Board recommends a permanent disability rating of 10% for the right knee post traumatic arthritis condition.


BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. In the matter of the PTSD condition, the Board unanimously recommends a reconstructive TDRL period of 6 months IAW VASRD §4.129 and DoD direction and unanimously recommends a TDRL entry disability rating of 50% and a permanent separation rating of 10% coded 9411 IAW VASRD §4.130. In the matter of the unfitting right knee condition, the Board unanimously recommends a TDRL entry disability rating of 10% and a permanent separation rating of 10% coded 5010 IAW VASRD §4.71a The Board agreed there were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration.

RECOMMENDATION: The Board recommends that the CI’s prior separation be modified to reflect that the CI was placed on TDRL at a combined 60% (PTSD at 50% IAW 4.129 and DoD direction) and then permanently separated with severance pay by reason of physical disability with a final combined 20% rating as indicated below:

UNFITTING CONDITION
VASRD CODE RATING
TDRL PERMANENT
PTSD 9411 50% 10%
Right Knee Post Traumatic Arthritis 5010 10% 10%
COMBINED
60% 20%


The following documentary evidence was considered:

Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20130506, w/atchs
Exhib
it B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans
’ Affairs Treatment Record





XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, DAF
President
Physical Disability Board of Review



SFMR-RB                                                                         


MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, US Army Physical Disability Agency
(AHRC-DO), 2900 Crystal Drive, Suite 300, Arlington, VA 22202-3557


SUBJECT: Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review Recommendation
for XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, AR20140004256 (PD201300235)


1. Under the authority of Title 10, United States Code, section 1554(a), I approve the enclosed recommendation of the Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review (DoD PDBR) pertaining to the individual named in the subject line above to constructively place the individual on the Temporary Disability Retired List (TDRL) at
60% disability for six months effective the date of the individual’s original medical separation for disability with severance pay and then following this six month period no recharacterization of the individual’s separation or modification of the permanent disability rating of 20%.

2. I direct that all the Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected accordingly no later than 120 days from the date of this memorandum as follows:

         a. Providing a correction to the individual’s separation document showing that the individual was separated by reason of temporary disability effective the date of the original medical separation for disability with severance pay.

         b. Providing orders showing that the individual was separated with a permanent combined rating of 20% effective the day following the six month TDRL period with no recharacterization of the individual’s separation.

         c. Adjusting pay and allowances accordingly. Pay and allowance adjustment will provide 60% retired pay for the constructive temporary disability retired six month period effective the date of the individual’s original medical separation and adjusting severance pay as necessary to account for the additional TDRL time in service.





3. I request that a copy of the corrections and any related correspondence be provided to the individual concerned, counsel (if any), any Members of Congress who have shown interest, and to the Army Review Boards Agency with a copy of this memorandum without enclosures.

BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY:




Encl                                                 
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
                                                      Deputy Assistant Secretary
                                                      (Army Review Boards)

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 00807

    Original file (PD2012 00807.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board agreed the TDRL rating recommendation would be based from the MEB evidence and the post-TDRL recommendation would be based from the VA evidence. The Board agreed the TDRL rating recommendation would be based from the MEB evidence and the permanent rating recommendation would be based from the VA evidence. In the matter of the left femur fracture condition, the Board unanimously recommends a disability rating of 10% at the time of TDRL placement and at permanent separation coded...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 00225

    Original file (PD2013 00225.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    There were no clinical records or VA C&P examinations proximate to TDRL exit in evidence. The CI was not tender on examination and subsequent neurological examinations were normal and also documented normal gait and posture. Again, there was no proximate C&P examination to TDRL exit, but the gait and posture were noted as normal on a 2010 neurology examination.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01787

    Original file (PD2012 01787.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Left Leg and Right Knee Conditions. The Board opined that the totality of the available evidence supports that the CI’s left leg condition of healed fractures of the femur and tibia resulting in valgus deformity with painful, limited ROM and mild to moderate instability most nearly met the 30% disability rating at the time of permanent separation.After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board recommends a disability rating of...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01512

    Original file (PD2012 01512.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The leg, hipand knee conditions, characterized as “bilateral shin splints,” “right tibial plafond stress reaction,” “bilateral femoral stress reactions,” and “left greater trochanteric bursitis & PFPS [patellofemoral pain syndrome],” were forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW SECNAVINST 1850.4E. Bilateral Leg PainCondition (includes Bilateral Shin Splints,Bilateral Femoral Stress Reactions, Left Greater Trochanteric Bursitis, and Left PFPS) :The narrative summary, 4 months...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 00141

    Original file (PD2013 00141.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    No other conditions were submitted by the MEB.The PEB adjudicated “chronic left knee and bilateral hip pain…”as unfitting and rated 0% IAWUS Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA) pain policy.The CI made no appeals and was medically separated. Left Leg Pain. BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01599

    Original file (PD-2013-01599.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Post-Separation)ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam [Right] S/P Distal Fibula/Tibia Fracture…5099-50030%S/P Operative Open Reduction, Right Ankle (Tibia and Fibula)52620%20031106**Mental Health ConditionNot AdjudicatedNo VA Entry20031106**Other x 0 (Not in Scope)Other x 4 (Not in Scope)20031106** Combined: 0%Combined: 20%Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD) dated 20070703 (in evidence)Exam not in evidence, utilized VARD 20070703 comments ANALYSIS SUMMARY :The Board also acknowledges...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00492

    Original file (PD2011-00492.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    The ratings for unfitting conditions will be reviewed in all cases. Bilateral Lower Leg Condition. Service Treatment Record.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01511

    Original file (PD-2013-01511.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. Right Femoral Shaft Stress Fracture Condition . The diagnoses were listed asright femoral shaft stress fracture; bilateral medial tibial plateau stress reactions; right second metatarsal stress reaction; and bilateral...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02131

    Original file (PD-2013-02131.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Therefore, the history of the injuries and immediate surgeries are presented together in an introduction, followed by separate discussions of the two residual conditions identified by the PEB and adjudicated as unfitting.The Board also noted that the MEB forwarded five RLE conditions to the PEB and the PEB characterized two unfitting conditions: “right knee pain,” which included the MEB listed conditions of right anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) avulsion, post-operative knee arthrofibrosis,...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD 2012 00854

    Original file (PD 2012 00854.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX BRANCH OF SERVICE: ARMY CASE NUMBER: PD1200854 SEPARATION DATE: 20030102 BOARD DATE: 20130213 SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty Reserve component First Lieutenant / O-1 (91A 5P/General Ordnance Officer), medically separated for chronic bilateral knee, ankle and hip pain (rated as a single unfitting condition). ...